Here’s the explanation:

Madison Gas and Electric Company (MGE) hereby applies for a permit to conduct utility line clearance operations including pruning and removal of trees in the public right-of-way of any street, alley, or highway under the jurisdiction of the City of Madison.

MGE has an obligation to perform tree trimming under Chapter PSC 114 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. This code adopts the National Electric Safety Code for Wisconsin which provides in Section 218 that trees interfering with ungrounded electric supply conductors must be trimmed or removed. MGE is required by Chapter PSC 114, adopting this code, to maintain tree-trimming services to prevent serious safety hazards caused by trees becoming intertwined with the electrical conductor.

Each tree located in the public right-of-way will be evaluated to determine whether pruning or removal isneeded to protect utility lines. Pruning operations will be conducted with the intent of providing four years of clearance from regrowth. MGE and its contractors will prune or remove trees in accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 and ANSI Z133.1 tree care operations and in accordance with the written guidelines and directives of the City Forester.

Utility line clearance operations will be conducted following the tree board approval. The areas within the city of Madison projected to be affected by line clearance operations are listed by street name and block numbers. See Exhibit 1.

And the locations:

Street names and block numbers in which Madison Gas and Electric Company utility line clearance operations are projected to occur from February 20, 2012, through December 31, 2012.

3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ALBERT CT
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARIZONA Cl
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARIZONA PA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARIZONA PA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARKANSAS AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4600 HUr–,IDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARNETT ST
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARNETT ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER Cl
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRIGHAM AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRIGHAM AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CARPENTER ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CARPENTER ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHEROKEE Cl
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHEROKEE Cl
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHERRY AV
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHERRY AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHRISTIANSON AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHRISTIANSON AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHRISTIANSON AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLAREMONT LN
200 HUNDRED. BLOCK OF CLYDE GALLAGHER AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLYDE GALLAGHER AV
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CODY LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CODY LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLORADO CT
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMANCHE WA
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMANCHE WA
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONCORD AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONCORD AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONCORD AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CORDELIA CR
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAPIN RD
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DARBO DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORTON Cl
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DREWRY LN
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DREWRY LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ‘EAST LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR Cl
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR LN
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FULTON LN
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GANNON AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GANNON AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOODLAND DR
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOODLAND DR
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOODLAND DR
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRACELAND AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRACELAND AV
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRAEDEL CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GROVER ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GROVER ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAAS ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAAS ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HERMINA ST
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HERMINA ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOME AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOME AV
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ILENE LN
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ILENE LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JACOBSON AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JACOBSON AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JACOBSON AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY Cl
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY DR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY Cl
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY LN
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY HEIGHTS
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY HEIGHTS
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENWOOD ST
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENWOOD ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LONGVIEW ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LONGVIEW ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARYLAND DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARYLAND DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELBY DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELBY DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONTANA Cl
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NANCY LN
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NANCY LN
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NANCY LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOBEL LN
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOBEL LN
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHVIEW DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHVIEW DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PINECREST DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF POWERS AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF POWERS AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PRAIRIE AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINCY AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINCY AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINCY AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REINDAHL AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REINKE DR
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEVIEW CT
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIGNEY LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEDALE AV
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEDALE AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWLAND AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWLAND AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHMEDEMAN AV
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ST PAUL AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUNFIELD ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUNFIELD ST
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TENNESSEE TR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TENNESSEE TR
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOBAN DR
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOBAN DR
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNION ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UTAH CT
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VERMONT Cl
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBB AV
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBB AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST LN
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINN TR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINN TR
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WORTHINGTON AV
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WORTHINGTON AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WYOMING WA
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WYOMING WA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WYOMING WA
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ZENO ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ZENO ST
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ALTEM Cl
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANNEN LN
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTLETI LN
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTLETI LN
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTON RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BELTLINE HY
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BELTLINE HY
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BELTLINE HY
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BELTLINE HY
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BIRCH AV
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BIRCH AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BIRCH AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BIRCH AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BIRCH Cl
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLACK OAK Cl
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLACK OAK DR
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLACK OAK DR
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLACK OAK DR
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAMERON DR
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAMERON DR
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAMERON DR
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAMERON DR
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAROMAR DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAROMAR DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAROMAR DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHATHAM TE
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHATHAM TE
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLIFDEN DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COURTLAND Cl
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CRABAPPLE LN
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CRABAPPLE LN
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORSETI DR
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUCLID AV
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUCLID AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUCLID AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUCLID AV
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FERN CT
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD AV
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD AV
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD AV
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD AV
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD AV
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FLAD Cl
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FRAUST Cl
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FREEPORT RD
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FREEPORT RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FRIAR LN
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GATELYTE
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GATELY TE
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILBERT RD
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GLEN DR
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GLENWAY ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GLENWAY ST
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
5900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAMMERSLEY RD
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HEMPSTEAD PL
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HEMPSTEAD RD
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HEMPSTEAD RD
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HEMPSTEAD RD
5900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HEMPSTEAD RD
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOLLY AV
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOLLY AV
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KEATING TE
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNETH ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNETH ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNETH ST
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KNOX LN
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KNOX LN
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KNOX LN
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEWON DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEWON DR
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEWON DR
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEWON DR
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEWON DR
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEWON DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LORUTH TE
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LORUTH TE
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LORUTH TE
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LORUTH TE
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANHASSET PL
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARIA PL
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARVIN AV
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MEYER AV
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MEYER AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MEYER AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MEYER AV
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MINERAL POINT RD
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MINERAL POINT RD
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MINERAL POINT RD
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MINERAL POINT RD
7600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MINERAL POINT RD
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONTAUK PL
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S OWEN DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S OWEN DR
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S OWEN DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PARK LN
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUL AV
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUNACK AV
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUNACK AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUNACK AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUNACK AV
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PIPING ROCK RD
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PIPING ROCK RD
5900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PIPING ROCK RD
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD.
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYMOND RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REETZ RD
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RUSSETI RD
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RUSSETI RD
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RUSSETI RD
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RUSSETI RD
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RUSSETI RD
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RUSSETI RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SAYBROOK RD
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STCLAIR ST
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STCLAIR ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STCLAIR ST
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STCLAIR ST
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STCLAIR ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEMP TE
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEMP TE
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUFFOLK RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUNRIDGE DR
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOEPFER AV
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOEPFER AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOEPFER AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOKAY BL
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOKAY BL
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOKAY BL
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOKAY BL
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
5900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOLMAN TE
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VERONA RD
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VERONA RD
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VERONA RD
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VERONA RD
5600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WESTBURY PL
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WESTMORLAND BL
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WESTMORLAND BL
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB Cl
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB DR
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB DR
5100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB DR
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB DR
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB DR
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITCOMB DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA.
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S WHITNEY WA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WICKLOW WA
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WICKLOW WA
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINNEMAC AV
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINNEMAC AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINNEMAC AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINNEMAC AV
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOODLAND WA
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ANDERSON ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTILLON DR
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTILLON DR
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARTILLON DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BELD ST
.1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BELD ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BELD ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRESLAND CT
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CEDAR ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CEDAR ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLARENCE CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLARENCE CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLBY ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLBY ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLBY ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAPLAINE CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAPLAINE CT
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAPLAINE CT
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERSON ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERSON ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERSON ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ERIN ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FISH HATCHERY RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FISH HATCHERY RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FISH HATCHERY RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FISH HATCHERY RD
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FISH HATCHERY RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GILSON ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAYWOOD DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAYWOOD DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAYWOOD DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HICKORY ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HICKORY ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HICKORY ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HIGH ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HIGH ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HIGH ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOFFMAN ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOMER CT .
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOMER CT
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KINSMAN BL
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE CT
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE CT
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKESHORE CT
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E LAKESIDE ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E LAKESIDE ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E LAKESIDE ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E LAKESIDE ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W LAKESIDE ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAWRENCE ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAWRENCE ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAWRENCE ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAWRENCE ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LOWELL ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LOWELL ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LOWELL ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MIDLAND ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MIDLAND ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MIDLAND ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF O’SHERIDAN ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF O’SHERIDAN ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E OLIN AV
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E OLIN AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E OLIN AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E OLIN AV
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOLIN AV
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OLIN TURVILLE DR
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ORIN RD
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S PARK ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PEARSON ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PIERSTORFF ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PINE ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PINE ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF POTIER ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF POTIER ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIMROCK RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWELL ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWELL ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SAYLE ST
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SHAW ST
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SHOPKO DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SHORT ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH SHORE DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH SHORE DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH SHORE DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH SHORE DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH SHORE DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRUCEST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRUCEST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRUCEST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRUCEST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STRAUBEL CT
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STRAUBEL ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STRAUBEL ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STRAUBEL ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VANDEUSEN ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VANDEUSEN ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VANDEUSEN ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VANDEUSEN ST
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITIIER ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITIIER ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHITIIER ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N WINGRA DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N WINGRA DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N WINGRA DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N WINGRA DR
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N WINGRA DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N WINGRA DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W WINGRA DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W WINGRA DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W WINGRA DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINGRA CREEK PY
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
2300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BADGER LN
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BADGER LN
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BADGER LN
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BADGER LN
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BADGER LN
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E BADGER RD
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E BADGER RD
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E BADGER RD
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BELTLINE HY
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURDETIE CT
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURDETIE CT
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURDETIE CT
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DUNWOODY DR
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DUNWOODY DR
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DUNWOODY DR
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DUNWOODY DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRLANE CT
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRLANE CT
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FELL RD
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FELL RD
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FOXWOOD TR
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOLDEN GATE WA
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOLDEN GATE WA
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GULL LN
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENT LN
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENT LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANOR DR
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MISSION Cl
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOORLAND RD
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOB HILL RD
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OCEAN RD
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OCEAN RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OCEAN RD
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROCKWOOD DR
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SALEM DR
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SEVEN NATIONS DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SIERRA CT
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WARNER ST
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WARNER ST
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAYLAND DR
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESTHER BEACH RD
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESTHER BEACH RD
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ETHELWYN RD
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FRAZIER AV
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FRAZIER AV
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FRAZIER AV
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GREENLEAF DR
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GREENLEAF DR
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRIMAN LN
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRIMAN LN
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF INDUSTRIAL DR
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF INDUSTRIAL DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHN NOLEN DR
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOB HILL RD
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOB HILL RD
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINN Cl
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYWOOD RD
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RAYWOOD RD
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROYAL AV
7300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SOUTH TOWNE DR
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOODLEY LN
5400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOODLEY LN
5500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WOODLEY LN
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ADAMS ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARLINGTON PL
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARLOW ST
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARLOW ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BERNARD CT
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BIRGE TE
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BLACKHAWK AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BLACKHAWK AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BLACKHAWK AV
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BLACKHAWK AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BLACKHAWK AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BLACKHAWK AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BLACKHAWK AV
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLUFF ST
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLUFF ST
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLUFF ST
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLUFF ST
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLUFF ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLUFF ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BOWEN CT
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BOWEN CT
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BOWEN CT
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BREESE TE
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BREESE TE
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BREESE TE
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BREESE TE
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BROOKS ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BROOKS ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BROOKS ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N BROOKS ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S BROOKS ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAMPBELL ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAMPBELL ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAPITOL CT
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHADBOURNE AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHADBOURNE AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHADBOURNE AV
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHADBOURNE AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHAMBERLAIN AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHAMBERLAIN AV
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHAMBERLAIN AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHANDLER ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N CHARTER ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N CHARTER ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N CHARTER ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N CHARTER ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S CHARTER ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S CHARTER ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S CHARTER ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S CHARTER ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLYMER PL
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLLEGE CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLLEGE CT
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMONWEALTH AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COYNE CT
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W DAYTON ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W DAYTON ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W DAYTON ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W DAYTON ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W DAYTON ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DRAKE ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DUROSE TE
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EAST CAMPUS MALL
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EAST CAMPUS MALL
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EBERHARDT CT
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELY PL
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERALD ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERALD ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERALD ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERALD ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EMERALD ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ENGINEERING DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ERIN ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ERIN ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ERIN ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ERIN ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUGENIA AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUGENIA AV
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUGENIA AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUGENIA AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EUGENIA AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAHRENBROOK CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAHRENBROOK CT
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FOREST ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FOREST ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GARFIELD ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GARFIELD ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GARFIELD ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GARFIELD ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GARFIELD ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GERRY CT
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRANT ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRANT ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRANT ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRANT ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRANT ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRISON ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRISON ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRISON ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRISON ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARRISON ST
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARVEY ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HILL ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOVEN CT
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOYT ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOYT ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JEFFERSON ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JEFFERSON ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JEFFERSON ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JEFFERSON ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JEFFERSON ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JEFFERSON ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W JOHNSON ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W JOHNSON ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W JOHNSON ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W JOHNSON ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENDALL AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENDALL AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENDALL AV
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENDALL AV
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENDALL AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KEYES AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LATHROP ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LATHROP ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LATHROP ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LATHROP ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LINCOLN ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LINCOLN ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MADISON ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MADISON ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MADISON ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MADISON ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MADISON ST
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MCKINLEY ST
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MCKINLEY ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N MILLS ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N MILLS ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N MILLS ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N MILLS ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S MILLS ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILTON CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILTON ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILTON ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILTON ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILTON ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONROE ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONROE ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONROE ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONROE ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONROE ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONROE ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOUND ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOUND ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOUND ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOUND ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MOUND ST
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OAKLAND AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OAKLAND AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OAKLAND AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N ORCHARD ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N ORCHARD ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N ORCHARD ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ORCHARD ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N OWEN DR
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PALOMINO LN
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PALOMINO LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PARK ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PARK ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PARK ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PARK ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPARK ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUNACK PL
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PRINCETON AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PRINCETON AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PROSPECT AV
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PROSPECT AV
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PROSPECT AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N PROSPECT AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N RANDALL AV
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N RANDALL AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N RANDALL AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S RANDALL AV
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RANDALL CT
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGENT ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGE ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGE ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGE ST
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGE ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROBERTS CT
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N ROBY RD
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S ROBY RD
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROCKY LEDGE LN
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWLEY AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWLEY AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHMITI PL
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SPOONER ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SPOONER ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SPOONER ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S SPOONER ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S SPOONER ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S SPOONER ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRING ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRING ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRING ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRING ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SPRING ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STJAMES CT
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STJAMES CT
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STJAMES CT
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STEVENS ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF STOCKTON CT
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUMMIT AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUMMIT AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUMMIT AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUMMIT AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
2800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
2900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VAN BUREN ST
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VAN BUREN ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VAN BUREN ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VANHISE AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VANHISE AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VILAS AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W WASHINGTON AV
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST LAWN AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST LAWN AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST SHORE DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINGRA ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINGRA ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ATWOOD AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ATWOOD AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ATWOOD AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ATWOOD AV
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ATWOOD AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRADFORD LN
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRADFORD LN
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRADFORD LN
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BUCKINGHAM LN
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BUCKINGHAM LN
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BUSSE ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BUSSE ST
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BUSSE ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CAREY CT
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLOVER LN
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLOVER LN
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLOVER LN
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W CORPORATE DR
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W CORPORATE DR
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COnAGE GROVE RD
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COnAGE GROVE RD
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COnAGE GROVE RD
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CUMBERLAND LN
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CUMBERLAND LN
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CUMBERLAND LN
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAWES ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAWES ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAWES ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAWES ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E DAYTON ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E DAYTON ST
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E DAYTON ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEMPSEY RD
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DENNEnDR
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DENNEnDR
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DENNEnDR
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FARRELL ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FARRELL ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FIRST ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FIRST ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FIRST ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S FIRST ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S FIRST ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FOURTH ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FOURTH ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FOURTH ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S FOURTH ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARDING ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARDING ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARDING ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARGROVE ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARGROVE ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HARGROVE ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHNS ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHNS ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHNS ST
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHNS ST
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JOHNS ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E JOHNSON ST
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E JOHNSON ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDD ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDD ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LANSING ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LANSING ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LANSING ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEON ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEON ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEON ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MAIN ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MAIN ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MAIN ST
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MAIN ST
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MAIN ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARGARET ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARGARET ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARGARET ST
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MIFFLIN ST
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MIFFLIN ST
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MIFFLIN ST
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E MIFFLIN ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OGDEN ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OLBRICH AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF OLBRICH AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUS ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PAUS ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REGAS RD
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RICHARD ST
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RICHARD ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RICHARD ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RICHARD ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RING ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RING ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RING ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIVERSIDE DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROYSTER AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SARGENT ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SARGENT ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SARGENT ST
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SARGENT ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHENK ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHENK ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHENK ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHENK ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SECOND ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SECOND ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SECOND ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S SECOND ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF S SECOND ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUSSEX LN
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUSSEX LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N THIRD ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N THIRD ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N THIRD ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N THIRD ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TULANE AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TULANE AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WALTER ST
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WALTER ST
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WALTER ST
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WALTER ST
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WALTER ST
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WALTER ST
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAYNE ST
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WILSHIRE LN
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WILSHIRE LN
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ALBERT CT
0 HUNDRED BL.OCK OF ARIZONA Cl
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARIZONA PA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARIZONA PA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ARKANSAS AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARBY LN
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARNETI ST
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BARNETI ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BLAINE DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER Cl
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BONNER LN
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRIGHAM AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BRIGHAM AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF BURKE AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CARPENTER ST
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CARPENTER ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHEROKEE Cl
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHEROKEE Cl
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHERRY AV
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHERRY AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHRISTIANSON AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHRISTIANSON AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CHRISTIANSON AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLAREMONT LN
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLYDE GALLAGHER AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CLYDE GALLAGHER AV
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CODY LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CODY LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COLORADO CT
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMANCHE WA
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMANCHE WA
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF COMMERCIAL AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONCORD AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONCORD AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONCORD AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CORDELIA CR
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAKOTA DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DAPIN RD
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DARBO DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DEBRA LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DELAWARE BL
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DORTON Cl
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DREWRY LN
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF DREWRY LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF EAST LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR Cl
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ELGAR LN
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ESCH LN
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N FAIR OAKS AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAIRMONT AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FULTON LN
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GANNON AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GANNON AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOODLAND DR
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOODLAND DR
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GOODLAND DR
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRACELAND AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRACELAND AV
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GRAEDEL CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GROVER ST
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GROVER ST
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAAS ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAAS ST
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HANOVER ST
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HAVEY RD
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HERMINA ST
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HERMINA ST
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOME AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOME AV
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ILENE LN
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ILENE LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF IOWA DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JACOBSON AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JACOBSON AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JACOBSON AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY Cl
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY DR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JAY DR
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY Cl
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY LN
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY LN
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF JUDY LN
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY RD
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY HEIGHTS
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENNEDY HEIGHTS
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENWOOD ST
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF KENWOOD ST
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE VIEW AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LEXINGTON AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LONGVIEW ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LONGVIEW ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MANDRAKE RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARYLAND DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MARYLAND DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFAIR AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MAYFIELD LN
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELBY DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELBY DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MELVIN CT
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MILWAUKEE ST
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONICA LN
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF MONTANA Cl
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NANCY LN
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NANCY LN
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NANCY LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
1500 HUN.DRED BLOCK OF NEVADA RD
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOBEL LN
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NOBEL LN
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHLAND DR
500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHPORT DR
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHVIEW DR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF NORTHVIEW DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PINECREST DR
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF POWERS AV
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF POWERS AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF PRAIRIE AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINCY AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINCY AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF QUINCY AV
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REINDAHL AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF REINKE DR
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RETHKE AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEVIEW CT
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIDGEWAY AV
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF RIGNEY LN
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEDALE AV
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEDALE AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROSEMARY AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWLAND AV
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ROWLAND AV
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHMEDEMAN AV
3800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
4900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
5000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SCHOOL RD
3700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N SHERMAN AV
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ST PAUL AV
900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF N STOUGHTON RD
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUNFIELD ST
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF SUNFIELD ST
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TENNESSEE TR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TENNESSEE TR
4400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
4500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
4600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
4700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TEXAS TR
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOBAN DR
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF TOBAN DR
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UNION ST
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF UTAH CT
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF VERMONT Cl
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF E WASHINGTON AV
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBB AV
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBB AV
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEST LN
700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WHEELER RD
1100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINN TR
1200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WINN TR
3000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WORTHINGTON AV
3100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WORTHINGTON AV
1000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WRIGHT ST
1400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WYOMING WA
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WYOMING WA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WYOMING WA
3900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ZENO ST
4000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF ZENO ST
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BROADWAY
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BROADWAY
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BROADWAY
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BROADWAY
2400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF W BROADWAY
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF CONSERVATION PL
5200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAYETIE AV
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF FAYETIE AV
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF GARDEN VIEW CT
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF HOBOKEN RD
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
5300 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE PARK BL
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
2400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
2400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF LAKE POINT DR
1500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2000 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2100 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2200 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2400 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
2500 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WA
0 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WAUNONA WOODS CT
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBER DR
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBER DR
1800 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBER DR
1900 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WEBER DR
1600 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WILDOAK Cl
1700 HUNDRED BLOCK OF WILDOAK Cl

FIGHTING POVERTY COALTION HOSTS FOOD ACCESS/HUNGER AWARENESS EVENT
Access to Affordable and Healthy Food is Important Issue for Those Living in Poverty

Thursday February 23, the Fighting Poverty Coalition (FPC) will host an event at St. Mark’s Lutheran Church, 605 Spruce Street, from 6-8 pm.

The goal of the FPC Food Access / Hunger Awareness event is to raise awareness of food access in Dane County in regards to access and affordability of grocery stores and use of pantries to fulfill basic food needs for those living in poverty.

Attendees will participate in a grocery shopping simulation with options of two grocery stores—one “good”, the other “not so good” (looking at prices and location). Shopping will be done with limited funds that may then result in the need to access a food pantry to meet the family’s food needs. There will also be a food pantry simulation to increase general awareness of what is needed to use pantries and what may be found at pantries.

There will be charts and fact sheets of food access and hunger issues in the area, including barriers to access such as transportation issues. According to Selena Pettigrew, President of the Allied Dunns Marsh Neighborhood Association, access to grocery stores can be a big issue in certain neighborhoods in Madison such as Allied Drive, “There is no grocery store here. You can go to Walgreens or the Mobil gas station to get bread and eggs but pay triple the price.” She also states that taking a bus to get to an affordable grocery store is extremely prohibitive, “Before I got my truck, it would take me four hours to get there and back to go to the Woodman’s by bus.”

Petitions and flyers of the “Food is a Human Right” Resolution will also be available. This resolution has been forwarded by the Madison-based community justice organization, Freedom Inc., and is being introduced to the Madison Common Council and Dane County Board for support. According to Monica Adams, member of Freedom Inc., “What is threatening us is not really an economic crisis, what is really happening is a human rights crisis. Food, in the simplest since, is a human right. This means that all people, such as the poor, people of color, people with disabilities, queer etc… have a right to eat healthy fresh food, grow their own food, and sell food. We are fighting to de-commodify food. The function of food should be to feed people, and not be a profit center for corporations.”

Information on food waste from grocery stores and area school districts will also be presented and discussed.

The Fighting Poverty Coalition is a collaborative group of organizations including Progressive Dane, Madison Urban Ministry, Freedom Inc., Operation Welcome Home, and other individuals concerned about the impact of poverty in the growing and diverse communities of Dane County. The FPC will invest in the future of Dane County by working to end poverty through unified efforts around race, education, health, housing, jobs and livable wages, transportation and food issues with education, outreach and advocacy.

Monday, February 6, 2012
8:15 AM MDC VENTURE DEBT LOAN COMMITTEE 133 S BLAIR STREET, MG&E OFFICES
- Closed session
Loan Requests – NeuWave Medical Inc.
Loan Status – aOva Technologies Inc & Gentel Biosciences Inc

4:00 PM HABITAT STEWARDSHIP SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM 108 CCB
- City of Madison Heritage Tree Program – Recognizing important tress in the city
- Madison Gas and Electric’s 2012 Line Clearance Request – The tree butchers are coming
- Invasive Species Control – developing a database of best practices for control, increasing volunteer help and allowing citizens who have been certified in pesticide use to use pesticides on invasives.

5:30 PM PLAN COMMISSION ROOM 201 CCB
- Transportation Plan Draft Scope of Work
- Choosing the Rifkin group to develop the 800 block of E Washington Ave
- St. Pauls

Tuesday, February 7, 2012
4:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE ROOM 108 CCB
- Alder discipline – trying to have this discussion again – an ordinance allowing them to do it and potential new rules.
- Policy on using the travel and conference account

4:30 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ROOM 313 MMB
- Authorizing an increase in bond issuance fees. – 1/2 of 1% payable at issuance
- Truman Olson
- Truax Phase I and II
- Villager Mall
- Fannie Mae Loan Status

4:30 PM MADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD PERSONNEL SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM 501 CCB
- Review of the Updated Class Spec/Position Description of Library Director
- Development of Supplemental Questions for the Library Director Position
- Organization of Panel Members who will score Supplemental Questions and Oral Exam

6:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL Room 201 CCB
- Goodman Community Center Liquor License
- Comprehensive Plan Amendments
- Moped Parking Committee
- Pres House payment of $30,000 to the city
- Report: Mayor Paul R. Soglin – February 7, 2012 – Economic Challenges Presented by Other Cities & Regions – ??
- Adams Outdoor advertising settlement, including new billboards in Madison
- Coop Conference
- Housing Diversity Report? wow . . . dusted that thing off?
- Cleaning up our water – phosphorus and suspended solids
- Sidewalk replacement schedule
- Vague plans for E Washington Redevelopment District, whatever they are, they will cost us money.
- Equally vague plans for University Ave, but at least they said what the project was.
- People getting kicked off committees for not filing their statement of interest forms. (Link broken)

SORRY – HAD A BUSY WEEKEND, WILL UPDATE THE REST AS SOON AS I CAN . . .

Wednesday, February 8, 2012
7:45 AM MDC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 550 W. WASHINGTON AVE – MDC BOARDROOM
10:00 AM STREET USE STAFF COMMISSION ROOM 108 CCB
10:30 AM MINORITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (MAC) ROOM LL-130 MMB
12:00 PM PERSONNEL BOARD ROOM103A CCB
4:00 PM EOC APPEALS COMMITTEE ROOM LL-120 MMB
4:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ROOM 108 CCB
4:30 PM CDA HOUSING OPERATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM 120 MMB
4:45 ETHICS BOARD ROOM LL-130 MMB
5:00 PM BOARD OF EDUCATION – COMMON COUNCIL LIAISON COMMITTEE ROOM 417 CCB
5:00 PM TRANSIT AND PARKING COMMISSION ROOM 260 MMB
5:00 PM URBAN DESIGN COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
6:30 PM BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS 1402 WINGRA CREEK PARKWAY

Thursday, February 9, 2012
12:00 PM EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE 401 N SEGOE RD
4:30 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 260 MMB
5:00 PM CITY-COUNTY LIAISON COMMITTEE ROOM 357 CCB
5:00 PM EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION ROOM LL-120 MMB
5:00 PM PLAN COMMISSION ROOM 300 MMB
5:00 PM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ROOM LL-110 MMB
5:30 PM BOARD OF HEALTH FOR MADISON AND DANE COUNTY 119 E OLIN AVE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This evaluation of the finances and operations of the Milwaukee Public Schools would not have been possible without the support, generosity, and commitment of many individuals and organizations.

First, several Milwaukee-area foundations and individual donors generously agreed to fund the independent evaluation, including the Helen Bader Foundation, the Northwestern Mutual Foundation, the Greater Milwaukee Foundation, the Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation, Mary Burke, the Argosy Foundation, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the Betty Brinn Foundation, the Joseph and Vera Zilber Foundation, the Weiss Foundation, the M&I Foundation, Linda Davis, and the Faye McBeath Foundation. This work could not have been done without their support.

Second, Mary Burke, president of the Board of Directors of the Boys and Girls Club of Dane
County and former secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce, generously volunteered her time and talents to manage this project on behalf of the governor and the mayor.

Mary’s leadership was critical to the success of this effort.

The report was very narrowly focused on how the Milwaukee Public School system could spend less money (by design). I think the appropriate term is “cuts”. While I do think that frugality is a good thing, let’s not forget that the point of a school is to education children.

So what did this committee come up with? The Milwaukee Express gets to the root of the proposed cost savings (or the “tools” as someone might say):

Myth: The McKinsey & Co. audit proved that MPS wastes $100 million a year.
Fact: What’s “waste”? The audit showed that MPS could save between $58 million and $103 million by making drastic changes to the way it does business. Whether those changes are practical or wise is another matter. The auditors recommended laying off 358 full-time employees in food services, decreasing work hours of other employees so that they qualify for BadgerCare and redesigning benefits packages. But the audit found that MPS’s spending per pupil is roughly the same as similar districts.

So is that wasteful spending? Southeastern Wisconsin has the highest health insurance rates in the state; that’s reflected in the cost of insuring workers. And squeezing some of the district’s lowest wage earners so that they go on BadgerCare doesn’t seem like a good idea for the workers or for taxpayers, either.

Wow, I wondering what kind of policies Mary Burke would support as a school board member? Yikes! Maybe someone should ask her where she sees opportunities for cost savings in the Madison school district.

Here’s the first thing I have seen in writing, but there have been lots of meetings and discussions up to this point and reports, but they were all oral reports up til now. Here’s the working outline of what the report will contain.

MADISON NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER STUDY – Outline for Report & Time Line

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
Background Role Centers play in our community How they are different than other “service providing agencies” Generalist vs specialists
Purpose (Why we need to study)
History of Centers
United Neighborhood Centers
Core/Facility Use model
Boys & Girls Club – first national model of center
Wisconsin Youth Company – first social enterprise model
Warner Park Creation & funding/operations model
Open Schoolhouse model
Short history on each center (year originated, moves, other significant changes, current size, etc.). Centers description of themselves.

FINDINGS
1998 (Last year of UNC) Map
Operational Funding
Capital Funding
Centers funded, Centers not funded
2011 Map
Operational Funding
Capital Funding
Centers funded, Centers not funded
Current Neighborhood Center Service Areas
Areas Not Served by a Neighborhood Center
Gaps in Service (need compared to current capacity)
Results of community conversations with residents
Review of models used by other cities & options to consider

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

APPENDICES

DISCUSSION ON REPORT
Here’s a few highlights of the conversation.
- Report will include Warner Park at the Mayor’s request, it is a different type of community center.
- Staff says that many people look at this and say “So, you’re only talking to neighborhood centers?” No, there will be 4 forums North, South, East and West. (But not downtown?)
- In 2002 there was a huge study, they spent two years and lots of money and nothing came of it in new policies, but there is a thick book on each center and the individual centers may have benefited from it.
- Tim Bruer asks if there will be an assets piece to this, will they look at other organizations providing services in the areas – like churches and schools and libraries. They says yes.
- Shiva Bidar-Sielaff asks about resident feedback, will it be not just asking about neighborhood centers but what services are or are no in their community. What is the unmet needs? Yes, that is the intent.
- Matt Phair asks if they will be looking at demographic information in the neighborhoods. The answer is yes, but . . . its hard to determine the population served areas for some neighborhoods.
- Phair says they need to look at gaps and deserts. (Yes, there’s that word, its been used several times now, deserts of services – its the new city hall buzz word.)
- Dan O’Callaghan asks if planning staff is helping with the mapping. The answer is yes.
- Bruer asks if they are looking at the Neighborhood Indicators – again the answer is yes but . . . there are not nice tidy boundaries of neighborhood centers and data areas in the Neighborhood Indicators.
- Skipped a long Bruer babble or two.
- Bidar-Sielaff says the history of centers is good, but might need a comparative model piece, it could go to a definition of a neighborhood center – they can be many things. When you call it history it seems like you are saying this is how they are formed, but you might want to point out the various models that can form. Different models do different thing, Centro Hispano or Kennedy or Neighborhood House serve citywide populations and then there is a traditional neighborhood center service a geographic area, then there is Warner Park which is completely different. – Bidar-Sielaff says she also wants to look at the goals to funding the centers.
- Phair points out there could be a hybrid model along with the ones that now exist.
- Bidar-Sielaff says that she saw the chart of who funds the centers, but she would like to know what each of them are funding.
- Bruer asks where Mayor Soglin is going, he knows he wants to work on anti-poverty issues, do we have a sense of where community based poverty initiatives vision would be and how community centers fit in with that?
- Anne Monks says that neighborhood centers are very important to Soglin, he is sympathetic to the needs of the Southwest side of Madison, but he is waiting for the study and is open to working with staff on the subject.
- Bruer continues to try to nail down the Mayor’s staff – he’s kinda obnoxious about it.
- Bill says that there are quarterly meetings with neighborhood center directors, the planning effort is a dialog with them, we expect them to be full partners, we have said that we can’t do this in an office and dump it on them, they think it is a good process.
- This will be on the agenda every month for updates and input. The working outline will change as they proceed.
- Phair says the community conversations might be better if there are roundtables on some sides of town, to get a group together of the major players, neighborhood leaders, public health nurses, etc so not just a public meeting, but a brainstorming of the leaders, I’m sure you could do that in all areas of town, you could ask what are the needs, what are you seeing?
- That was it, the mostly liked the outline.

Here’s the timeline that was not discussed.

JANUARY
Outreach to all CDD Committees, Mayor, other City departments, institutional partners, Council Leadership, Centers (ongoing)
Staff and center data collection, mapping, etc.

FEBRUARY
Updates to CDD Committees, Mayor, other City departments, institutional partners, Council Leadership
Staff and center work continues

MARCH
Conduct Community Conversations – Focus Groups
Updates to CDD Committees, Mayor, other City departments, institutional partners, Council Leadership
Staff and center work continues

APRIL
Analysis, draft recommendations
Briefing and draft recommendations discussed with all CDD Committees, Mayor, Council Leadership and Centers
Drafting of final report

MAY
Briefing of Common Council prior to their 5/15 meeting

So, keep your eyes open for a community discussion near you, unless you live downtown.

Well, two things. First of all, it got overshadowed by the 100 block of State St, it was on the agenda for the same meeting. Second of all, the area was planned and discussed and the project mostly complies with previous plans, so it makes it easier to get approval. That is the real issue with the 100 block of State St and the Edgewater, the projects don’t comply with plans and there wasn’t community discussion about what should go in these places. Plus, this developer was open to suggestions from the neighborhood and actually worked with them to answer questions instead of playing silly games. The ordinance change is a little odd in this case . . . especially from an alder that “respects zoning” and won’t make an ordinance change for a Bed and Breakfast to go in a place that was a Bed and Breakfast for 20 years. But that’s a different issue . . . There are two items on the agenda, first the ordinance change and then the project. This is the discussion – about an hour long.

THE ORDINANCE
Dick Wagner, the chair of the Urban Design Commission asks Bridget Maniaci to explain the ordinance revision.

Maniaci says we are finally to the point where we have developers at the table in a very long process on East Washington Avenue. Before you, you will notice what is currently on the books and what is proposed. She is proposing on the 700 block to divide on the East WAsh side to be 2(c) of that, it would allow 10 stories plus 2 bonus stories with the criteria already laid out in the Urban Design District. She was not part of the process, Marsha (Rummel) was a part of the discussion and it is an evolving process. There has been a lot of interest in the project in the neighborhood, very very positive feedback. Basically to throw out why this is ok, this is acceptable, it is within in the plan and in the spirit of the discussions. If you look at it in context of what is going on and what is across the street, what was approved, across the street was 12 stories plus two bonus heights and her side of the street was approved at 8 stories plus two bonus heights. The reason behind all that was we want jobs and commercial development and on the residential side we understand that there are single family homes, 2 flats, 3 flats and apartment buildings close at hand and that is why there was a difference between the two. As the conversation has evolved, we have found very quickly that when it comes to the commercial side of the line, you need a lot of parking for office workers compared to if the same space was taken up by residential which is a less dense use and to get those densities we were envisioning, we have the plan flipped. The residential is what is able to be built and it requires less parking so there is easier financing on that side. Since this was done many years ago and there has been continued conversation on this, she is comfortable with this, the neighborhood has really thought about this, and talked about this and we have a proposal that meets, she thinks, the only criteria it doesn’t meet is on the height. It meets all the set back requirements, it meets all the mixed use and the envisioning that was done in this plan and the realities of the market is that they are not capable of doing a shorter building and there is new information about the soil conditions on the site, not only is the water table about 4.5 ft down, but the soil boring conditions are very poor. (BK note: This should not be a surprise to anyone!) So, what it takes to build a building in this spot , in this corridor is not an insignificant amount of money and to do this project effectively, the height of a building not currently envisioned when this plan was put together is required. She is keeping this very tailored and specific to the site in question, she is not looking to open it up for the entire corridor but to deal with the folks that have come to the table as a part of the city process. The city has determined they are going to make an investment here and spend taxpayer dollars with the intention of making it happen but there are realities to making it happen and this is one of the realities we have hit against. (BK note: buildings can be value engineered, costs can be cut, I don’t think that happened in this case and we haven’t seen any numbers on the rents they are charging or the financials to make any determination about what the financial realities are – having said that tho, I’m not too concerned about the extra stories, but it is odd to make an exception in ordinance for one project – we should have the broader policy discussion about the entire area.)

Richard Linster, President of the Tenney Lapham Neighborhood Association says he isn’t well prepared because he just found out about the meeting at noon. He is neither in support or against because he is representing the neighborhood association and we have not made a recommendation, however he believes there is strong support for the project and for raising the height. Initially he thought there would be a great concern, but he attended the 5 public meetings on the project and at the UDC meeting and there might be several people that have a concern, but that has not been stressed at the meetings. People are more concerned with traffic. He thinks it will be a boon for Tenney Lapham, the corridor and the City of Madison.

Marsha Rummel asks Maniaci why she chose to amend the ordinance the way she did? Why is it split that way?

Maniaci says the planning process was clear about the step back to the Mifflin St. facade. Because the Mifflin St. side is supposed to be a lower density and more residential use even in the mixed use buildings. She says that is a consistent issues. Also, the proposal is meeting the guidelines and boundaries and she didn’t see the reason to amend it.

Rummel clarifies her question, why did you exclude other frontage on E. Washington?

Maniaci says it was to be as narrow and tailored to the project before you, she would be interested in expanding that if the committee wanted to do that, she is open to it. She didn’t want to open up the entire thing and ask where is that point we should draw the line. But she is open to their suggestions.

Rummel asks Heather Stouder from Planning staff to talk about Urban Design District 8 and why we would do this in this manner.

Maniaci says it is because that is where she told them to draw the line.

They clarify among themselves, Rummel says she was surprised that this was subdivided just for this project.

Maniaci says that since they don’t know what is happening with Reynolds she only wanted to address what they have here.

Rummel says that we can always change it, I guess.

(I just gotta ask, what is the point of plans and ordinances if they just get routinely changed for projects an alder supports – but not for the ones an alder might not support?)

Todd Barnett says that the heights are based on a story and we need to be conscious of the height in relation a story. If you have a project that is 9 feet floor to floor, which I am sure this project is not, that is 9 x 9 is 81 vs 9 x 12 = 108, that’s 2 stories, so we need to talk a little bit about what the real height of the building is. The second issue is that we often see projects that are quite tall and they get scaled back, that’s just the normal process, was there a discussion about this being a precedent and what if the next project needs to be 13 stories and what if that is the same height. He doesn’t have an objection to it, but you all know its a process.

Maniaci had discussions with staff and wanted to know if she should give herself some room to maneuver and then I thought why put you guys through that, why not just ask for what we need, compared to having the discussion about 14 or 16 stories. We have a project before us, by doing it this way the project coming forward will have to make the case for what they are doing and given the current dynamics, this is what she thought was simplest and straightforward and honest to bring to you.

Barnett looks at the project.

Maniaci says in the floor to cieling heights.

Barnett clarifies floor to floor.

Manaici says it was very much a discussion early on in the process and when the developer get up . . . she has a a procedural question, the developer could present and they could work these two together.

Wagner says that is possible, the conundrum is that if we don’t recommend a change in the height in the ordinance it is hard to recommend the building so the logical sequence would be to approve the height. You could do it subject to the presentation of the project and initial approval of the project pending. The other thing on the height, the heights on teh other side were 12 and the other side was lower because of the concerns of the neighborhood and if they are no longer concerned maybe it isn’t a big deal. There was a lot of your side vs our side of the avenue kind of discussion.

Maniaci interrupts and says there has been a lot of discussion looking at the context of the site and further down – you can see how the Mifflin St side is right on top of the houses on Curtis Court or Mifflin itself, but these blocks with Breese Stevens, Reynolds Park and Reynolds – you are looking at truck storage, a surface parking lot, the water utility building, so the conversations in the neighborhood are that where we are looking the height is not a concern.

Rummel says the real key to the residential approach is the 30 degree angle and the development respects that and that is where is steps down dramatically to the Tenney Lapham side and she thinks that was the main success of this plan for Tenney Lapham.

Wagner asks what they want to do. Rummel moves approval, it is seconded.

Rummel says they should comment about the floor to floor issue.

Al Martin, Urban Design Commission staff says that if you look at the table it gives you average story heights. 9 – 12 feet excluding the first floor and if in total it exceeds those parameters you are sent back two stories.

Barnett asks if they can have a penthouse on top of that?

Yes.

Wagner says all these issues were approved, they are not newly before us.

Barnett asks about the zoning definition of a story, architects are different than planners, what defines a story?

Stouder says that a story has a broader definition in the zoning code, they can include messanines etc, it allows for a greater height than you might normally think of as a story.

Wagner says we will not solve that broader issue tonight.

Manaici says if there is something they want her to bring forward to this body she would be happy to, if you see something that is in need of work.

Barnett says no.

Martin says that non-inhabitable space does not count.

Barnett says that . . . lots of talking . . . but a penthouse or mechanical floor would not count. So if a large building had a full floor of mechanical space, that would not be a floor but the building would be 13 floors.

Staff and Wager says this is the ordinance not the project.

Passes unanimously.

THE PROJECT
Developer says the changes since last time include:
- When they presented last November they made assumptions about the project and soil conditions, at the end of the December those assumptions were challenged in regards to the soil. (DUH! Again, they should have known this – I’m pretty sure I told them and have brought it up repeatedly – we learned this on the Gorman project which is why they couldn’t build a 16 story building.)
- They salvaged the tower with some structural changes, there are some minor changes on Mifflin St.
- The courtyard is rotated, the gardens are moved to the center of the block.
- They made changes to the rendering, similar materials and massing.
- They updated the lighting
- Materials is a discussion internally and with staff
- The height issue is a big one
- They think that the meet all of the Urban Design guidelines except the height and on Mifflin, there is a 5 – 20 foot setback requirement, there is a 10 foot MG&E easement, they can’t meet it in some areas. There is one area that is 35 feet set back adn the ordinance allows them to request that if there are gardens
- As of last Thursday they got bumped up to a higher seismic category and they need extra bracing in one area.
- They are looking at the treatment of the Livingston entrance but have not figured out how to break that up any better

Commission Discussion highlights:
- Are they confident that there will not be many changes to height and massing? Yes. They have some structural changes internally. The exterior should look the same.
- Privacy issues on the balconies have been addressed. They have had other projects where the balconies weren’t used or people put up screens. At least one bedroom separates each balcony in this case.
- Barnett says the scale of the first floor/base of the building might be too much. The architects explain their thinking.
- Several questions about the materials and the changes
- No plans for the community room yet, concern about the accessible route to the community rooms – they say that there are a lot of things that they are working through. Maniaci says “we’ll add it to the list”
- Lots of architechty talky-talk on details most of us don’t consciously notice.
- Concern about street lighting on Livingston – there is none currently on Livingston or Mifflin. They are trying to figure out why Livingston is not lit. They are doing ambient and building lighting.
- Bike parking is an issue – how will that work and impact circulation. What will it look like when parked full. Currently bikes are chained anywhere they can find in the neighborhood. How do they make it not look cluttered? Also concerns about bike storage inside.
- Maniaci says that when the expand the TID some infrastructure changes can occur and they can put that in the city budget.
- There are questions about who uses what elevators and which are public.
- Moped parking is also an issue – Maniaci says she doesn’t want them, it is different than on campus, but there might me more in the future.
- They have electric car, community car and moped parking in the garage.
- Community gardens are moved, daylighting was better elsewhere. They don’t want community gardens with jugs of milk, but they want to work with the residents to program it. They have true garden space, but can they spread kale, tomatoes as an ornamental. Also working to retain storm water to water plants. They might have rows of apple trees. They might have a restaurant that would do gardening but neighbors were concerned about pets.
- Some discussion about the types of trees they put in and the soils.
- A request to buy local.

And with that, initial approval is granted. Just that simple when you pay attention to plans and ordinance and neighbors – no one seems to even care that the building is a few stories taller, because they complied with the vision for the area.

The function of the Commission is to serve as the regional planning and areawide water quality management planning entity for the Dane County region, consistent with §66.0309, Wis. Stats. and state Administrative Code NR 121. The Commission is charged with the duty of preparing and adopting a master plan for the physical development of the region, and maintaining a continuing areawide water quality management planning process in order to manage, protect, and enhance the water resources of the region, including consideration of the relationship of water quality to land and water resources and uses.

Wnat more? More info here. The Commission is composed of thirteen Commissioners appointed by the Mayor of the City of Madison (4), the Dane County Executive (3), the Dane County Cities and Villages Association (3), and the Dane County Towns Association (3). It costs the county 3/4 of a million dollars a year to run it and they have little control over the budget.

Anyways, here’s the County Executive’s thoughts.

DATE: February 2, 2012
TO: Dane County Cities and Villages Association
Dane County Towns Association
FROM: Joe Parisi, Dane County Executive
RE: Reforms to the Dane County Capital Area Regional Planning Commission

In the wake of recent correspondence from the Department of Natural Resources regarding a proposed urban service area amendment rejected six times by the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission, I’m more resolved in the need to achieve overdue reforms to this agency.

There is an upcoming public hearing on this project and its potential impacts on the Sugar River and Badger Mill Creek. I remain hopeful the DNR will ultimately act in the best interest of these sensitive watersheds and in accordance with the regional concerns expressed with this proposal several times. This process has been a reminder of the limitations that exist with a planning agency that’s constrained to an advisory role.

As County Executive, I’ve heard near consensus on the belief that an effective CARPC could be helpful in managing our county’s rapid growth while balancing the needs of our more than $3-billion a year agricultural industry and protecting our natural resources. In this ideal role, it could help facilitate boundary disagreements between our 61 unique cities, towns, and villages and look at the county as a whole to identify areas for future growth and other infrastructure needs that result from developments.

There will be continued discussion by some about eliminating CARPC entirely. At a minimum, we owe our citizens a CARPC with a refocused mission and enhanced authority to evaluate development proposals.

I’ve met with representatives of the Department of Natural Resources and they have indicated they would be much more deferential to decisions made by CARPC should it be officially recognized as a “Designated Water Planning Agency.” This was identified as one of the original goals when CARPC was reconstituted in 2007 and was one of the easy-to- achieve reforms I proposed shortly after becoming County Executive.

I respectfully ask our partners with the Dane County Cities and Villages and Dane County Towns Associations to pass legislation encouraging the state to assign the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission this designation. I will work with the Dane County Board to secure a similar resolution. Together, there’s no reason why these resolutions couldn’t be approved by July 1st of this year and doing so will help guide this summer’s budget discussions.

If we’re willing to commit resources of Dane County taxpayers to fund the countless hours of work this agency does on reviewing urban service area amendments, we should be willing to strengthen its authority. As we’ve been reminded by this most recent proposal affecting Badger Mill Creek, the absence of this water planning designation greatly undermines the credibility and effectiveness of CARPC’s current process. We can and should do better.

Dane County cannot afford in this day and age to spend $755,707 a year to simply advise the DNR. We either need to give CARPC the appropriate authority to accomplish the goals of this work or have the DNR pursue alternatives less reliant on our taxpayers.

As elected officials, especially given our current budget restraints, it’s our responsibility to be careful stewards of the public’s money.

It should give all of us pause to think how much good the $755,707 in county tax levy spent on CARPC could do if invested into helping the growing number of children and families living in poverty, our veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan or confronting the ravages of heroin abuse in our communities – - as just a few examples.

Absence of support for this water planning designation would raise new questions about the cost benefits of this agency. I ask that communities consider this important reform prior to this summer’s work on CARPC’s 2013 budget. Other regional planning commissions have secured this designation and avoided drawn out conflicts with the DNR over development proposals. We should follow their lead and trust the judgment of the bright minds of those appointed to CARPC.

Additional reforms should also be discussed in the months ahead.

CARPC staff and members of the Commission have expressed interest in moving the agency’s offices. This will result in higher than budgeted expenses for 2012. The county currently hosts the agency at the City-County Building and provides valuable information management services at no additional cost to taxpayers. Without a similar arrangement, this would presumably change with any new lease or purchase of other space and speaks to the need for greater CARPC budget oversight by the Budget and Personnel Panel. We cannot take lightly the reality that decisions made by the Commission affect taxpayers. Because of that, I’m directing the Dane County Department of Administration to investigate whether the county can negotiate with CARPC to keep them in a county owned facility.

Efficiencies and new revenue opportunities discussed during the past several CARPC budget processes shouldn’t continue to languish. It’s been stated many times that our partners with the cities and villages are open to reviewing a per acre fee mechanism to recoup the costs associated with reviewing proposed developments. This is especially true since it is undisputed that reviewing these proposals is one of the most time consuming and costly responsibilities that CARPC performs. Currently, nearly all of that cost is born by county taxpayers. A mechanism to secure this non-taxpayer revenue source needs to be in place in advance of what certainly will be another challenging budget process for 2013.

We further need to pursue better collaboration with agencies like CARPC and the MPO. For example, better coordination may have helped better plan for costly transportation improvements now being pursued as a result of rapid growth experienced in recent years on the southwest side of Madison and Verona. Proposed upgrades to two county highways impacted by this rapid development could run upward of $35 million to our taxpayers in the coming years. This doesn’t include the ongoing costs to maintain and repair these roads.

I have in the past suggested ways to combine these and other groups important in the consideration for how our county grows. Given how residential and commercial development, transportation, and economic development are intertwined, continued consideration should be given to the potential consolidation of these agencies.

Thank you.

Joseph T. Parisi
Dane County Executive

Lauren Cnare (I think?) says the issue is that Council members want to have control over what committees they are on.

Satya Rhodes-Conway says that what council job description is and our role on committee will determine this – she thinks job description is important – she has thoughts of who should be on committees, but can’t talk about this if she doesn’t know where the group is on those things – the question for who appoints alders to committees hinges on what is alders role on the committee.

Steve King asks if we just did this, wasn’t there a review of committees thing? A Schumacher discussion on who makes appointments.

Tim Bruer says that there was not discussion, the discussion was at the 10K foot level, he says the question is who is mayor of this body, are we in control of our destiny? Should the mayor determine the role of council? They didn’t have a political will at the time, there was even a discussion about looking at how many committees and overall framework of the city and do we need a mayor or professional manager or ceremonial mayor and we ran out of time. They have been discussing this for 30 years, this council is different, there is more of an appetite realizing changes taking place, to really look at us as an organizational structure and leadership, to have a legislative agenda. It is an issue of who is mayor and not, who chairs our meetings, is the council its own independent body or not? (NOTE: State law makes the Mayor a member of the Council and says that the Mayor should chair the meetings if present)

Mark Clear says Rhodes-Conway asked an interrupting question, lets deal with that

Bridget Maniaci says she is in favor of tabling and having a bigger discussion at a later date, wants to move on to alder job description

Larry Palm says either way, a line in the job description will say serve on committees as necessary, it won’t go into committee work

Rhodes-Conway says they need to be clear on our role on a committee, what is our responsibility to the committee and role to council

Palm asks if everyone is not on a committee

Rhodes-Conway says they need to know their job on the committee, some have different ideas

Sue Ellingson wants to hear more about the job description

Rhodes-Conway says that 3 big pieces of job description – constituent service, city policy, committee service. She thinks that there are multiple roles on committees, and some of more important one are the ones we should at least articulate – it should be their job to know Roberts Rules of Order, to know legistar and how things go through the city process, appointees and staff don’t know that often., we can bring the process knowledge role. We can also be a liaison between committee and council, if you are sitting on committees and they are having a big picture policy discussion or suggesting big changes to ordinances, we should make sure the council knows that, and make sure committee knows your sense of the council. If its an immediate thumbs down and they are not talking about it, or yes we are on board and they can forward and get it done – the committee should know that. And then participating in work of committee and discussion – if everyone agrees that is the role, then we can go forward, but we need to check that everyone agrees

Matt Phair says they should table the appointment thing, he would love to listen to that discussion, all that stuff at orientation was not discussed, we learned about the staff but not that.

Maniaci says that committees have different roles, some are project based (ALRC or Urban Design Commission) which is different than housing where there is a policy base, topic discussion or reviewing plans. We need to deal with our own house first before get into committee discussion, they are not equal and tasks and charges are different, how do we handles these committees?

Clear agrees with Rhodes-Conway

Paul Skidmore agrees with Rhodes-Conway, when he got on the council, that was how he looked at the priorities, we should table and move forward with job description (This might be the only time he speaks too)

Lauren Cnare says this is a simple question, who makes our appointments, we can talk about what we do when we get to committees, do we want us to appoint alders to committees, its yes or no. The mayor had come quite specifically to talk about hits issue, we do need to do the other discussion but this is s different question that could be knocked off.

Bruer says that issue has gone on for decades, lets argue we have an agenda and its different than the executive branch. It could be the Overture or policy, whatever, but there is a separation of powers, let’s be real, council has an agenda and policies and how does this work. The Executive Brank appoints the alders, there is a trail of dead bodies of alders on or not on committees and we should be concerned about that. Are we in fact in control of our own destiny or influenced by the executive authority. The mayor has the responsibility for department heads and we all know depending on who is mayor, that job can be different like the TIF Coordinator, it depends upon how staff responds to alders and the priorities. He has been on both sides of this, if political issues between alders and different areas of the city the executive has the muscle. Is the Council in control of its own destiny, should leadership be one or two year, the fact of the matter is that the reason they didn’t take it on was fear of intimidating the executive branch or our own inability to tackle it. He thinks this is the council that can accomplish it. The bigger discussion is a yes or no question – do we want to be in that role.

Bidar-Sielaff says that what is the role – do we take it over and do it, it is not the only thing we can do

Maniaci asks how long to get to yes or no?

Cnare thinks they can get it done in 20 minutes

Bidar-Sielaff says that haven’t responded to Rhodes-Conway about if discuss or not, but the logic of what goes first – can we respond to that, makes sense to her

They vote about moving forward and its a 8 – 7 vote

Clear says they are almost done with the discussion

Rhodes-Conway says they should just deal with it – she will defer to Cnare, and is hoping it will only be 15 minutes – but in order for it to be productive, she needs to hear what the alternative is, we know the status quo, convince me why we are talking about a change and what are the options> So we can get away from the big picture at 100K feet of the legislative branch vs the executive branch.

Maniaci says the council can take it on, Dave gave us a ranking sheet, we picked committees and he pieced it together, the good former alder form 20th was pulled off all committees for political purposes

Rhodes-Conway says she said she didn’t want to serve on them

Maniaci says that if they do it on the council, more in-house, there will be not a lot of acrimony that can happen.

Much uproarious laughter!!!!!!

Cnare is checking in with the mayor and whispering back and forth.

Palm says he had an issue with Cieslewicz, but he doesn’t trust this body would be better, we would have done the same to Pham-Remmele. Unless you have a policy of every alder get their top pick, its still political, still alder vs. alder, we are not then trudging into our own jungle of our own making. He says that even if you don’t like the committees you get, you still work with the mayor on citywide issues.

Bidar-Sielaff says that we have a discussion and ability – mostly discussion is with mayor’s office, whatever format – but it is that way. We have to have a discussion among us, even if the process is the same, sometimes I’d like to say you’d be good on this committee cuz of your skills, and we should create a process for the discussion. New alders, unless really involved, go into the committees blind. She is looking for ability to discuss among themselves to balance it out and see who wants what, if someone wants it really badly, maybe go to the mayor and say that is what she wants.

Weier favors the mayor making the appointments, how about some ground rules about number of appointments

Resnick says the ground rules are that we switch, that process has worked out, its a double edged sword, can have those discussions. As rookie alders he watched the other senior alder and their actions took precedent. Its different watching Mike at the Downtown Coordinating Committee or Mark at Economic Development Commision. That is how he determined his role and whatever packet they were talking about that they got when they were new, he never read or saw, if you want to continue writing it go ahead, but that is the truth. He is not saying Mike or Mark were wrong on how they guided that discussion, but how many years that would it take to correct that if they are wrong. It could have impact 4 – 6 years down the road

Sue Ellingson wants to hear from mayor

Mayor Paul Soglin says the mayor should make appointments, in making the appointments he sayse that for himself, there is a lot of balancing that needs to take place, for example, different parts of the city being represented, advantages of tenure and institutional knowledge vs. new people opportunity to serve, diversity in geography but also gender, race, etc,

Mike Verveer shows up – he was at the Bookless event at the library.

The mayor says that people trading, its fine except will it result in in balance, they try to accommodate everyone’s issue and look at citizen and other appointments to get balance

Cnare agrees with the mayor and they are important, any of those tenets could be followed by the council, trading is not that easy, there are plumb committee assignments and the committee no one wants, we have to negotiate with each other on issues, why not learn to negotiate about where you want to be at the committee level. We have the ability and it will enrich our relationships and will lead to greater discussion – the mayor’s office might ask who will be on the committee with you, we as a group should forward a slate of recommendations to the mayor. You know if it fits your schedule, we need to take stronger role, we are masters of our destiny, we can use the knowledge of each other, not about the mayor, maybe eliminate the trading that needs to go on.

Channel 27 shows up, but after they interview the Mayor and Cnare and find out they are not talking about Brian Solomon, they leave.

Lisa Subeck says that it all sounds lovely, but highly impractical, as a new alder, between the time elected and when appointed will we learn what we need to know to have that council discussion – some of us came in with knowledge of committees, but its very unrealistic to think we would make those decisions that don’t exclude newly elected first time alders

Rhodes-Conway agrees with balance, in her committees she learned things on committees she didn’t want to be on. We do, however need to think about new alder training, the info is about departments and not what our job is, she doesn’t care where end up, there are other more important things to talk about in committee structure – changing who makes the appointments won’t make a difference in the committees and a rationale process

Phair says that the elephant in he room is politics, if we do it, there will be politics and its not bad to say that out loud

Maniaci says she likes the Cnare compromise, we get first crack, and we have to approve it in the end and if it is out of line we will have the ultimate say. If new mayor, think about those two weeks to get your administration in place, they won’t need to chase us down too

Bruer says that 1000 pound gorilla will not be taken on, there was very much interest in this, this is not about Bauman, Cieslewicz or Soglin, he suggests that CCOC or a workgroup work on this. They are not only looking at what others do, and see what options and alternative are out there and come together with a framework and then with getting input and feedback, if you don’t think this is about politics, he has been on both sides of the sword, he has more faith in institution of council to vet the diversity and representation, that is where his vote is, he hopes that if agreement they can put time and energy into it to do this right, let us have the discussion, and let us move this forward so we can agree to itPart

Rhodes-Conway says we did this this already.

Bruer says they did not

Rhodes-Conway says we had a work group – we talked about it, we declined to take it up

Bruer say no, this is different, its a different feeling with different council, we talked about it and decided not to move forward

Weier asks for s straw poll

Maniaci doesn’t know what they are voting on

Bruer says take it to CCOC – that would be most constructive use of time and energy

They agree to do that.

Part three coming.

That of course was the opposite of the truth, as spelled out by Superintendent Craig Gerlach.

“The numbers at Monona Grove clearly don’t work. We struggled to put together a budget this year, we made significant cuts in terms of programs, laid-off teachers… we closed a building. Next year, quite frankly, will be brutal.”

Well the most recent MGSD school board meeting brings Mr. Knutson’s lack of understanding of our district into even more focus. The main focus of the meeting was was that class sizes are a serious concern.

“We have some eye-poppers for specific classes, primarily at the high school,” said Monona Grove Superintendent Craig Gerlach.

Lets take a look at some of those numbers:

In four-year-old kindergarten (4K), class sizes range from 17 students to 19 students. The district guideline for 4K class sizes is 12-18 students per class. There is one morning section that is over the maximum guideline by one student.

The guideline for kindergarten is 16-23 students per class. The current sections of kindergarten at Taylor Prairie School have range from 21 students to 22 students. First grade classes at Taylor Prairie range between 21 students and 23 students. The district guideline for first grade is 17-24 students.

Second grade classes at Taylor Prairie currently have 22-23 students, and the district guideline suggests anywhere from 17-24 students.

There are two sections of second grade at the maximum 24 students, and two sections at 22 students. The suggested maximum class size for third grade is 25 students per section. Cottage Grove Principal Deb Lyons said out of eight sections, seven are at 22 students per class, and one is at 20. The fourth grade maximum according to district guidelines is 26 students, and the sections currently are at 21-24 students.

Second grade sections have the highest enrollment, with one section at the maximum of 24 and three sections at 23. Third grade ranges between 19-21; fourth grade has 21 students in each section; and fifth grade ranges between 18-21.

The board looked at the homeroom classes at Glacial Drumlin Middle School. Fifth and sixth grade classes follow the district’s elementary guidelines with a maximum of 26 students in each class. Fifth grade ranges between 25 and 26 students; sixth grade had nine sections, and some of them are over the suggested 26 maximum

The guideline for seventh grade was changed last year, and the maximum class size suggested for seventh grade is now 30 students to a class. This year, there are eight sections of seventh grade that range from 23-27 students. The maximum for eighth grade is also 30, and there are eight homeroom classes that range between 26-28.

Where we are falling under the “guidelines” we are bursting at the seems. Let’s also remember that the “guidelines” have been increased beyond where they should be to begin with. Which leads to the question of what do we do to fix this problem. Right now thanks to Governor Walker’s and the republican’s drastic cuts to education, there is no other option. Increase class sizes or cut more programs or both.

There is a consensus though – we are in serious trouble and it is going to get worse:

“It is difficult,” Monona Grove principal Paul Brost said. “Teachers have done a good job handling it. It isn’t ideal. I’m concerned about next year with the coming cuts.”

Board member Susan Manning said the larger class sizes was a direct effect of the $1 million deficit the district is facing.

“This is one of the direct effects of the million dollar deficit. If that’s going to be OK for this community, then don’t encourage us to go to referendum,” she said. “And accept that that’s how your student will be taught. That’s not good enough for me.”

“Higher class sizes is going to affect student learning,” Gerlach said. “If we reduce class sizes, something else has to go. I’ve told staff to budget to the max. If you don’t want me to do that, we have to change the guidelines. The only way to minimize cuts is to increase class sizes. If we’re going to decrease class sizes, we have to cut something else. It’s painful, but it’s our task at hand.”

Gerlach said if class sizes were lowered, the board would have to look at cutting programs. “There’s nothing else to cut,” he said.

Board President Susan Fox said the board is potentially looking at a referendum for next year.

“The public needs to understand what these cuts in education have done,” Fox said. “We’ve been able to balance the budget because that’s what we’re required to do, but what’s missed is what’s been lost.”

The question we will be faced with at the upcoming recall election’s will be: Is it working. The answer is yes and no.

If you are a supporter of dismanteling free public education to be replaced by privatized education then yes the education “reforms” are working. If you believe, like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin did, that free quality public education is incredibly important and a cornerstone of our society then by no means is republican education policy working. Its a clear contrast.

What say you Mr. Knutson?